!! This site is no longer maintained.
If this page doesn't automatically transfer,
Go
here for the most recently updated space links pages !!

 

Reusable Launch Vehicle Information

A fully reusable launch system will ultimately provide the low cost access to Space that is required to bring about extensive human exploration and colonization of the solar system.

The Space Shuttle succeeded technically as a partially reusable launcher but failed miserably economically. It requires several thousand support personal and takes 2 months or more to prepare for launch. Shuttle launch costs are roughly $20,000/kg, which is actually higher than many expendable launchers.

There many designs under development of robust RLV systems that bring the costs down to $2000/kg on the short term (2-5 years) and to $200/kg on longer term (10-20 years).

Here is a set of resources about such RLV projects present, past and future.

 

Reusable Launch Vehicle Countdown
Company Kistler+ Rotary+ Kelly*

Pioneer**

Space Access@
Vehicle K-1 Rotan Astroliner Rocketplane SA-1
Design 2-Stage, 
Vertical Takeoff, 
Parachute Return
1-Stage, 
Vertical Takeoff & 
Landing
2-Stage 
(Stage 2 non-reusable) 
Horizontal Takeoff 
(with tow assist) 
& Landing
2-Stage 
(Stage 2 non-reusable) 
Horizontal Takeoff 
(Inflight refueling) 
& Landing
2-Stage 
1st:  Ramjet,
Horizontal Takeoff 
& Landing
2nd:  
Reusable rocket 
Crewed No Yes (2 pilots) Yes (pilot stage 1) Yes (pilot stage 1) No
Test Flights 2001? for orbital tests 1999 ATV tests ? ? 2002
Orbital Flights - 2001? ?  ? "
Operational 2002? 2002? mid-2002 (earliest)  ? 2003
 
Company ScaledComposites 
(Burt Rutan)++
Vela Technology~  Lone Star Space Access

TGV Rockets^

Cerulean Freight Forwarding 11
Vehicle Proteus SpaceCruiser/ SpaceLifter Cosmos Mariner Michelle Kitten
Design 2-Stage 
Horizontal Takeoff 
& Landing
2-Stage sub-orbital 
Horizontal takeoff & landing
1-Stage sub-orbital 
Horizontal takeoff & landing
Single stage sub-orbital Vertical takeoff & landing 1-Stage sub-orbital, Horizontal take & landing
Crewed Yes (3 to orbit) Yes (2 pilots & 6 passengers for SpaceCruiser, 2 pilots for SpaceLifter) Yes (3) Yes(3) Yes(3)
Test Flights Stage 1 launch platform  flew in Aug.98.
Stage 2 ?
Dec. 1, 2001 ? ? 2001

+From published reports these companies have significant funding:

Rotary, as of July of 1999, had raised around $30M and needs ~$120M to reach operational status. A vehicle to test the rotary landing system rolled out March 1 and was flown three times by the fall of 1999. In June the company reorganized and dropped the the centrifugal pumped engine, as well as most of the employees working on it, in favor of using a derivative of the Fastrac engine developed for the X-34 program. Current emphasis is the search for funds while the design for the orbital test model goes on. See RLV News for latest status.

Kistler has raised around $500M and needs at least several hundred additional millions. The company has beed searching for funding for the past couple of years, see news items below, while construction has apparently slowed considerably. Poor corporate bond market would mean paying exorbitant interest rates so they've decided to postpone a bond issue. Occasional news articles nevertheless indicate that some vehicle development continues. Extensive testing has taken place and continues on the engines, parachute landing, etc.
March 18, 1999:

Good News - Northrop-Grumman has invested $30M in Kistler and may invest $30 more.
Bad News - Northrop-Grumman has written off the $30M as a loss because of the current problems at Kistler.
However, if Kistler can get its finances back on track, Northrop will continue investing in them.
April 25, 1999: Taiwan banks invest in Kistler, see news.
July 28, 1999: Kistler was reported to receive committments from Saudi Arabian investors for funds to complete test program but this apparently fell through later.

@Space Access now finally has a web page (www.spaceaccess.com) but it is empty of content. The company's proposed vehicles have been described in detail in Aviation Week, March 30, 1998 and in a June 1999 Popular Science article. Their vehicle is on the scale of the shuttle or VentureStar. It will require about 5 billion dollars of funding but could carry major GEO payloads (with a 3rd stage orbital vehicle) and people to the space station as well. See the Space Access Space Transportation Architecture study for NASA. Stephen Wurst's testimony to space subcommittee discusses possible government financial assistance. According to Space News they have raised about $100 million so far.

++Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites company is developing the Proteus, which is already flying, and it is intended primarily for non-space applications, particularly for wireless transmission stations. However, he also wants to use it as a first stage for launching a suborbital rocket. Funding seems to be coming from Scaled Composites and Angel Techologies, which is developing the wireless system.

*Kelly has successfully tested the tow technique with a F-106 towed into flight by a C-141. They have not been able to begin construction of their launcher, however, due to funding shortfall. In meantime they have received several contracts from NASA for studies of low cost launch technology. A report from SAS says they will be in the black in 2000. According to Space News (May 10, 1999) Kelly has spent about $10million and needs $390million more to build its first vehicle.

**Pioneer announced in Feb. 1999 the appointment of former astronaut Ed Gibson as president (There was also a company restructuring last year. ) In Nov. 1999 a fourth design iteration passed an external design review. Robert Zubrin left Pioneer Rocketplane to concentrate on the Mars Society and other Mars related projects via his Pioneer Astronautics company. Previously in 1998 Pioneer was one of 4 companies awarded a study grant in NASA's Bantam program. Pioneer says they successfully showed that their design would come very close to the $1.5M per launch cost goal (History). However, NASA chose to discontinue the program. According to Space News (May 10, 1999) Pioneer has raised about $5million and needs $300million to fly.

~ Haven't found any data on funding or construction status for Vela Technology's sub-orbital system. Vela was previoulsy supported by Zegrahm Expeditions, a well known adventure tourism company for their space tourism project. The tourism project was sold in fall of 1999 to Space Adventures,which seems to be maintaining the Vela collaboration. Vela also has a strong development and management team, as well as a collaboration with reputable AeroAstro.

#Houston Business Journal reports that Lone Star, formerly Dynamica Research, needs $100M to build the Cosmos. They have 3 main investors but will also raise extra funds by selling sponsorships.

^TGV aims for the sounding rocket market with a reusable suborbital. The piloted vehicles would provide rides for microgravity , astrophysics, atmospheric and other scientific experiments. They have put together a strong management team and are currently raising money. They need around $50M.

11 Cerulean Freight Forwarding is one of the small startup companies hoping to construct very, very low cost vehicles. Their first vehicle, the Kitten, will be an X-Prize entry. They need another $400k to begin construction (private comm.) Follow on vehicles include an orbiter for 6 people.

Launch dates were gathered from web sites and published material. I will update them as more info appears. 

RLV News

Other RLV News sites:
RLV Alert at Spacer.com - Space Frontier Society -
Space Access Society Updates
- X-33 History Timeline
- Highway2Space - NASA Watch Launch System News

April 2000

X-33 engine passes 250sec test on April 6th. According to the NASA X-33...more

March 2000

X-38 successfully completed the program's highest and longest drop test...more
Check out HASTOL, a combination reusable hypersonic sub-orbital vehicle...more
X-33 engine test succeeds on March 22 in a reaching the full 220sec duration...more
Ground effect first stage booster
for an RLV has been proposed by a Russian...more
X-33 engine test interrupted 75secs into a planned full-duration 220secs run..more
Beal Aerospace's BA-2 partially reusable. Beal recently tested the larges...more

February 2000

X-33 Linear Aerospike Engine fires for 120secs at 100% power during the latest...more
Japan's HOPE-X unmanned test vehicle is a testbed for reusable technology...more
X-34 first powered flight is postponed
to the fall according to the Aviation ...more

January 2000

X-33 progress. The X-33 Timeline reports some good news for the project...more
Buzz Aldrin's StarBooster web site is now online. The proposed reusable first...more
Flyback boosters
, vertically launched first stage with wings attached to return ...more
X-33 may switch to aluminum hydrogen tanks
. After the failure of the...more
X-33 aerospike engine completes first full power test. The 18sec test on ...more
Second X-34 vehicle construction advances. The wing section was attached to...more


General

Cost Comparisons - How much does it cost to put a kilogram into space? Here are some various cost tables.

RLV Link Lists

Regulatory & Legal Issues

RLV Projects in US

RLV Projects Outside of USA

 
MainMenu Clark's HomePage